James Madison to Littleton Dennis Teackle, June, 1824.
Mentioned in this letter
- Government, Law, and Military
- Political economy
- Historic Homes and Places
Montpelier
About this letter
- Description
- Letter from James Madison to Littleton Dennis Teackle, June, 1824.
- Creator
- Madison, James
- Creation Date
- June 1824
- Subjects
- Teackle, Littleton Dennis, 1777-1848
- Madison, James, 1751-1836
- Item Type
- letter
- Identifier
- Series: Series 1, General Correspondence, 1723-1859 Microfilm Reel: 20
- Publication Information
- Teackle, Littleton Dennis, and James Madison. James Madison to Littleton Dennis Teackle, June. June, 1824. Manuscript/Mixed Material. https://www.loc.gov/item/mjm019422/.
- Institution
- Library of Congress
- Collection
- The James Madison Papers at the Library of Congress
Teackle Lit. Dennis copd
Montpr June 1824
Dr Sir
I have recd. yours of the 8th inclosing the plan of a Work under the title of “Political Economist.”
The Science of political Economy has recd much elucidation from Modern discussion; But it is so important to the prosperity of States, that it merits every further light that can be thrown on it. The application of its true principles to our Country, wch is not in some respects similar to the Old ones of Europe, is well worthy the attention of an Enlightened Society, such as that referred to in Baltimore. And it is an encouragement to their efforts, that if we are behind the Old World in some respects, we are less fettered by inveterate habits and prejudices, and consequently more docile to instruction & improvement.
improvement. That these may be promoted by the lubrications and labours of the Society, is my sincere wish. Were I more competent, under any circumstances to aid it by mine, the pledge wd. now be forbidden by the wear and tear of life of wch. I am becoming sensible. Perhaps I ought in candour to add that although I am not unfriendly to public interpositions, the private pursuits in certain cases forming clear exceptions to the general rule of a "free industry." I am so much attached to the general rule, that it is quite possible, my views with respect to the exceptions would too little harmonize with those of the Society, for a beneficial cooperation.